Skip to main content
PF TECH Insights
internal11 min readinvestigative

The Multiplier Model — a field study in capacity

Internal test post for the immersive scrollytelling layout. Four chapters, full-bleed frontispieces, chapter TOC, reading progress.

Greg Zatulovsky
Greg Zatulovsky, CPA
April 16, 2026
PF TECH
Share

The first measurement we took across the cohort was not a productivity stat — it was a recovery stat. How many hours a week were team leads spending on work that should never have been theirs. The number was bigger than anyone expected.

We did not change anything in the first month. We just measured. Mapped. Sat in finance closes, watched grant teams reconcile spreadsheets by hand, listened to program managers reformat the same export every Friday afternoon. The point of the first month was to make the cost legible to the people paying it.

By the end of the month we had a list. Not a wishlist — a triage list. The workflows that were costing the most, ranked by where the multiplier would land first.

A multiplier is a structural thing, not a marginal one. The first time you save someone an hour a week, that is a tidy result. The third time, with the same person, on a different workflow — that is where the math starts working.

Each step in the flow is small. The compounding is what makes it real. The full sequence is below — read at your own pace; the visual on the left tracks where you are.

By the time the fourth workflow lands, the team has stopped thinking of "the AI work" as a separate project. It has become how they operate.

Three months in, something happened we did not predict. The team leads started running their own workflow audits. Without us. The vocabulary had transferred — they were now identifying their own multiplier candidates.

Capacity, it turns out, is not the absence of work. It is the absence of the work that should never have been manual.

The harder, more interesting question — and the one we are still answering — is what teams do with that recovered capacity. The honest answer so far is that they do more of the work that drew them to the sector in the first place.

If the first chapter was about measurement and the second about compounding, the fourth is about transfer. Not "How do we scale this", which is the wrong frame, but "How do we make this true for the next ten partners".

The Mission Multiplier Program is the answer we are testing. International, cohort-based, taught from inside the work. Launching April 2026.

33 reads
Share
Greg Zatulovsky

About the author

Greg Zatulovsky, CPA

Founder & CEO, PF TECH · 15+ years in non-profit finance, operations & technology

Greg founded PF TECH to give Canadian non-profits access to the same operational infrastructure as the private sector — without the overhead. He writes about AI adoption, financial management, and the practical realities of running a mission-driven organisation.

FAQ — Knowledge Base

Browse frequently asked questions about Knowledge Base

Apply for the Founding Cohort

Spots are limited. Applications are accepted globally and reviewed the week of April 6 — apply early for priority consideration. If selected, you'll receive a secure payment link to confirm your spot. Sessions begin May 1, 2026.